Production Stage Preset
Standard juvenile grow-out: target C:N 12-15, normal feed rate.
Pond & Water Parameters
m³
ppt
°C
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Shrimp Stocking
/m³
g
%
Estimated standing biomass
1.7 tonnes · feeding rate 2.4% of biomass
Feed Input
kg/day
%
%
Carbon Strategy
/kg
mg/L
mL/L
kg O₂/h
Today's Carbon Dose
0
kg of Sucrose
≈ $0.00 daily cost · 0 g/m³
⏱️ Application Schedule
No supplemental carbon needed.
C:N Ratio Dial
What Your Results Mean
📊 System Risk Assessment
Your system is currently operating within safe parameters. The calculated carbon dose will maintain heterotrophic bacterial dominance, keeping TAN and NH₃ at manageable levels through bacterial assimilation.
✅ Recommended Actions
- Continue regular monitoring of TAN, NH₃, and NO₂ every 12-24 hours
- Maintain current C:N ratio and carbon dosing schedule
- Monitor dissolved oxygen before and after carbon application
References: Avnimelech (2009); Ebeling et al. (2006); Hargreaves (2013)
Nitrogen Budget
N load from feed
0 g/day
TAN excreted to water
0 g/day
C from feed (heterotroph-available)
0 g/day
Total C needed (substrate basis)
0 g/day
Supplemental C required (maintenance)
0 g/day
Correction C for excess TAN
0 g (one-time)
Total C to dose today
0 g total today
N assimilated by bacteria (target)
0 g/day
Predicted residual TAN
0 g/day
⚛️ Understanding Your Nitrogen Budget
The nitrogen budget shows how feed protein converts to ammonia and how carbon dosing drives bacterial assimilation. When supplemental carbon matches or exceeds the C:N target (typically 12-20:1), heterotrophic bacteria convert toxic ammonia into microbial biomass (biofloc), which shrimp can consume as a protein-rich food source.
🎯 How to Optimize Nitrogen Management
- High TAN (>2 mg/L): Increase C:N ratio to 18-20:1 temporarily. Add carbon in 3-4 splits over 12 hours. Reduce feeding by 20-30% until TAN drops below 1.5 mg/L (Avnimelech, 2009; Crab et al., 2012)
- High residual N predicted: If residual TAN >200 g/day, raise target C:N to 18:1 or switch to lower-protein feed (28-32%). Consider adding nitrifying bacteria inoculum to establish autotrophic pathway (Ebeling et al., 2006)
- Feed C sufficient: When feed waste alone meets C:N target, skip dosing but verify TAN at next test. This typically occurs with low-protein feeds (<30%) or low feeding rates (<2% biomass) (Hargreaves, 2013)
- Correction dosing: For accumulated TAN >1 mg/L, apply correction dose in first split, then maintenance. Monitor TAN every 4 hours during correction period
References: Avnimelech (1999, 2009); Ebeling et al. (2006); Crab et al. (2012); Hargreaves (2013)
Toxicity Analysis
Un-ionised NH₃-N (toxic form)
0.00 mg/L
% of TAN as NH₃
0%
pKa at T, S
9.18
NH₃ safety margin (chronic)
0 ×
☠️ Understanding Ammonia Toxicity
Total Ammonia Nitrogen (TAN) exists as two forms: ionized ammonium (NH₄⁺) and un-ionized ammonia (NH₃). Only NH₃ is toxic to shrimp gills and hemolymph. The proportion of NH₃ increases dramatically with pH and temperature — at pH 8.0 and 28°C, approximately 3-5% of TAN is toxic NH₃. Even low TAN can become lethal if pH rises above 8.5.
🛡️ How to Manage Ammonia Toxicity
- NH₃ >0.15 mg/L (CRITICAL): Stop feeding immediately. Lower pH gently with CO₂ injection or acid drip (food-grade phosphoric acid at 1:1000 dilution). Add double carbon dose in 4 splits over 12 hours. Begin 20-30% water exchange with clean replacement water if available (Lin & Chen, 2001; Boyd & Tucker, 2014)
- NH₃ 0.05-0.15 mg/L (Stressful): Reduce feed by 30%. Add carbon dose immediately. Monitor pH every 2 hours — small pH rises multiply toxicity exponentially. Consider adding Yucca schidigera extract (1 g/m³) to temporarily bind ammonia (Emerenciano et al., 2017)
- NH₃ <0.05 mg/L but TAN rising: Proactive carbon dosing before pH spike. Add NaHCO₃ to stabilize pH at 7.8-8.0. Ensure adequate alkalinity (>120 mg/L) to buffer against pH swings (Boyd & Tucker, 2014)
- pH management: Maintain pH 7.5-8.3. Above pH 8.5, NH₃ toxicity increases 3-4×. Below pH 7.0, nitrification slows and heterotrophic efficiency drops. Use NaHCO₃ (not CaCO₃) for rapid pH buffering (Martins et al., 2010)
References: Emerson et al. (1975); Lin & Chen (2001, 2003); Boyd & Tucker (2014); Emerenciano et al. (2017)
Alkalinity Management
Current alkalinity
0 mg/L
Deficit vs target
0 mg/L
Liming agent dose (correction)
0 kg
Daily maintenance (heterotroph)
0 kg/day
Alkalinity loss this dose
0 mg/L
⚗️ Understanding Alkalinity Dynamics
Alkalinity is the water's buffering capacity against pH changes. In biofloc systems, both heterotrophic bacteria (consuming 3.57 g CaCO₃ per g N assimilated) and nitrifying bacteria (consuming 7.05 g CaCO₃ per g N oxidized) deplete alkalinity continuously. Without replenishment, pH crashes below 7.0, stopping bacterial activity and causing ammonia spikes. Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO₃) is preferred over calcium carbonate for rapid correction because it dissolves instantly and provides immediate HCO₃⁻ ions.
⚗️ How to Manage Alkalinity
- Alkalinity <80 mg/L (CRITICAL): pH crash risk imminent. Add NaHCO₃ in 2-3 splits over 6 hours (never all at once). Recheck pH and alkalinity in 4 hours. Target 140-160 mg/L for startup, 120-150 mg/L for mature systems (Boyd & Hargreaves, 2001; Hargreaves, 2013)
- Alkalinity 80-120 mg/L (Low): Add correction dose in 2 splits today. Begin daily maintenance at 0.22 kg NaHCO₃ per kg feed. Monitor weekly — biofloc systems typically lose 20-40 mg/L alkalinity per week (Ebeling et al., 2006)
- Alkalinity >150 mg/L (High): Safe but monitor for excessive hardness if using CaCO₃. In marine systems, maintain alkalinity 120-150 mg/L to balance with natural seawater buffering (Boyd & Tucker, 2014)
- Daily maintenance: Apply 0.2-0.25 kg NaHCO₃ per kg feed daily, split between morning and evening doses. This replaces heterotrophic alkalinity consumption and stabilizes pH (Hargreaves, 2013; SRAC 4503)
- Compound selection: NaHCO₃ (baking soda) dissolves instantly — ideal for corrections. CaCO₃ (agricultural lime) dissolves slowly — better for long-term maintenance. Avoid quicklime (CaO) which causes pH spikes >9.0 (Martins et al., 2010)
References: Ebeling et al. (2006); Boyd & Hargreaves (2001); Hargreaves (2013); Martins et al. (2010); SRAC 4503
Oxygen & Aeration
O₂ demand from carbon dose
0 kg
DO drop during peak respiration
0 mg/L
Minimum aerator-hours needed
0 h
CO₂ produced
0 kg/day
💨 Understanding Oxygen Dynamics
Biofloc systems have elevated respiration rates (2-6 mg O₂/L/hour) due to high bacterial biomass. Carbon dosing triggers a bacterial respiration surge that peaks 2-4 hours post-application, consuming 50% of added carbon as CO₂. Dissolved oxygen must stay above 4 mg/L at all times — below 3 mg/L, shrimp become stressed and bacterial nitrification stops. The system cannot survive power outages exceeding 30-60 minutes (Hargreaves, 2013; SRAC 4503).
💨 How to Manage Oxygen Demand
- DO <3 mg/L (CRITICAL): Do NOT dose carbon. Maximise all aerators immediately. Add emergency aeration (backup blowers, paddlewheels at 100%). If mortality begins, prepare partial harvest. Never add carbon when DO is below 4 mg/L (SRAC 4503; Hargreaves, 2013)
- DO 3-5 mg/L (Low): Hold carbon dosing until DO recovers above 5 mg/L. Increase aeration 30 min before planned dose. Run aerators at 100% for 4 hours post-dose. Consider reducing carbon split sizes and increasing frequency (6 splits instead of 3) (Emerenciano et al., 2017)
- Peak respiration management: Start aerators 30 min BEFORE carbon application. Peak O₂ demand occurs 2-4 hours post-dose. For large doses (>5 kg), extend high aeration to 6-8 hours. Monitor DO hourly during peak period (Hargreaves, 2013)
- Aerator sizing: Standard requirement: 1-5% water volume per minute airflow. For 1000 m³ pond, use 10-50 m³/min blower capacity. Paddlewheel aerators: 1.5-2.0 kg O₂/kWh efficiency. Calculate total system O₂ demand (shrimp + bacteria + carbon) and size aeration at 150% of peak demand (SRAC 4503)
- Emergency preparedness: Install DO alarms with automatic backup power. Biofloc systems fail within 30-60 minutes of power loss. Keep backup generators or battery-powered aerators ready. Response time is much shorter than conventional ponds (Hargreaves, 2013)
References: Hargreaves (2013); SRAC 4503; Emerenciano et al. (2017); Ebeling et al. (2006)
Biofloc Production
Bacterial biomass produced
0 g (today)
TSS contribution per day
0 mg/L
Crude protein in floc
0 g/day
No reading
Enter Imhoff reading in Inputs tab to see biofloc volume status.
Enter Imhoff reading in Inputs tab to see biofloc volume status.
Enter Imhoff reading above
🦠 Understanding Biofloc Production
Biofloc is the microbial biomass produced when heterotrophic bacteria assimilate ammonia using supplemental carbon. This biomass contains 30-40% crude protein and serves as a natural food source for shrimp, reducing feed costs by 15-30%. However, excessive biofloc (>500 mg/L TSS) increases oxygen demand, clogs shrimp gills, and creates anaerobic zones. The optimal settleable solids range is 10-15 mL/L for shrimp (measured by Imhoff cone after 15 minutes settling).
🦠 How to Manage Biofloc
- TSS >500 mg/L (High): Reduce carbon dosing by 25%. Increase solids removal via settling chambers or foam fractionators. Check Imhoff cone readings daily — target 10-15 mL/L for shrimp. Excessive solids cause gill clogging and oxygen depletion (Hargreaves, 2013; SRAC 4503)
- TSS <100 mg/L (Low): Increase C:N ratio to 15-20:1 to stimulate bacterial growth. Verify aeration is adequate to keep solids suspended. Low floc = poor ammonia control. Add probiotic inoculum if starting new system (Avnimelech, 2009)
- Imhoff cone monitoring: Measure settleable solids daily at 10:00 AM. 10-15 mL/L = optimal for shrimp. >25 mL/L = remove excess. <5 mL/L = increase carbon. Use 1L cone, 15-minute settling time (SRAC 4503; Hargreaves, 2013)
- Floc as feed: Biofloc contains 30-40% protein and can replace 15-30% of commercial feed. Shrimp >5g consume floc effectively. Monitor feed trays — if floc is abundant, reduce pellet feed by 10-15% (Crab et al., 2012; Emerenciano et al., 2017)
- Solids removal methods: (1) Settling chambers with 2-4 hour retention, (2) Foam fractionators for fine solids, (3) Periodic draining of central sludge, (4) Resuspend settled solids with paddlewheel repositioning. Never let solids accumulate on bottom — anaerobic zones produce H₂S (SRAC 4503)
References: Avnimelech (2009); Hargreaves (2013); Crab et al. (2012); Emerenciano et al. (2017); SRAC 4503
Cost Summary
Carbon source today
0.00
Liming agent (correction + maintenance)
0.00
Total carbon + alkalinity
0.00
Cost per kg shrimp biomass
0.00
💰 Understanding Your Costs
Carbon and alkalinity costs typically represent 8-15% of total production costs in biofloc systems. While higher than conventional ponds, this is offset by zero water exchange costs, improved FCR (1.0-1.2 vs 1.4-1.6), and higher survival rates (80-90% vs 60-70%). The cost per kg shrimp should ideally stay below $0.30-0.50 for carbon + alkalinity combined.
💰 How to Optimize Costs
- High carbon costs: Switch to lower-cost sources: molasses ($0.20-0.40/kg) vs sugar ($0.50-0.80/kg). Consider local agricultural byproducts: rice bran, wheat flour, or cassava starch. Verify carbon content with lab test — actual %C varies by source (Avnimelech, 2009; Hargreaves, 2013)
- Reduce alkalinity costs: Use agricultural lime (CaCO₃) for maintenance at $0.10-0.20/kg, reserve NaHCO₃ ($0.30-0.50/kg) for emergency corrections. Apply CaCO₃ in slurry form for faster dissolution. Monitor to avoid over-dosing (Martins et al., 2010)
- Feed optimization: Lower protein feed (30-32%) reduces carbon requirement by 20-30%. Every 1% protein reduction saves ~0.1 kg carbon per kg feed. Balance with growth performance — test on small scale first (Emerenciano et al., 2017)
- Economies of scale: Buy carbon sources in bulk (tonne lots). Negotiate with local sugar mills for molasses. Store in dry, ventilated area — molasses ferments if wet. Shelf life: sugar indefinite, molasses 3-6 months (Hargreaves, 2013)
References: Avnimelech (2009); Hargreaves (2013); Martins et al. (2010); Emerenciano et al. (2017)
Trend — Last 14 days
● TAN (mg/L)
● NO₂ (mg/L)
● Dose (kg)
Saved Sessions
0 sessions
No saved sessions yet. Hit "Save to history" on the Results tab.
Verified Formulas
1. Nitrogen load from feed
N_feed (g/day) = Feed_kg × 1000 × (Protein% / 100) × 0.16
TAN_excreted = N_feed × Excretion_fraction
0.16 = 1/6.25, N content of protein. Excretion 40-75% (default 50%, Avnimelech 1999).
2. Carbon required (Avnimelech method)
C_needed = TAN_excreted × C:N_target
Mass_source = C_needed / C_fraction
Avnimelech (1999, 2009) — C:N targets 10-20 for biofloc heterotrophic dominance.
3. Un-ionised ammonia (NH₃)
pKa = 0.09018 + 2729.92 / (T + 273.15)
f(NH₃) = 1 / (1 + 10^(pKa − pH))
NH₃-N (mg/L) = TAN × f(NH₃)
Emerson et al. (1975). Salinity correction applied per Bower & Bidwell (1978).
4. Alkalinity correction
NaHCO₃ (kg) = Deficit_mg/L × Vol_m³ × 1.68 / 1000
1.68 = MW(NaHCO₃)/eq.wt.(CaCO₃) = 84/50. Standard stoichiometry.
Heterotrophic alkalinity loss = 3.57 g CaCO₃ / g N consumed
Nitrification alkalinity loss = 7.05 g CaCO₃ / g N oxidised
Ebeling et al. (2006).
5. Oxygen demand
COD_source ≈ 1.07 g O₂/g (sugars), 1.18 (starch), 0.95 (molasses)
O₂_demand = Mass_source × COD × Respiration_fraction
~50% of C respired, ~50% to biomass (Ebeling 2006). Distributed over 8-12 h.
6. Biofloc biomass
Biomass_VSS = N_assimilated × 8.07 g VSS/g N
Crude protein ≈ Biomass × 0.30-0.40
Stoichiometric balance per Ebeling et al. (2006).
Shrimp Tolerance Thresholds
| Parameter | Safe | Stressful | Critical |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAN (mg/L) | <1.0 | 1.0-3.0 | >3.0 |
| NH₃-N (mg/L) | <0.05 | 0.05-0.15 | >0.15 |
| NO₂⁻-N (mg/L) | <1.0 | 1.0-3.0 | >5.0 |
| DO (mg/L) | >5.0 | 3.5-5.0 | <3.0 |
| pH | 7.5-8.3 | <7.0 or >8.7 | <6.5 or >9.0 |
| Alkalinity (mg/L) | 120-200 | 80-120 | <80 |
| Temperature (°C) | 27-31 | 23-27 / 31-33 | <22 or >34 |
Values for Litopenaeus vannamei. Lin & Chen (2001, 2003); Boyd & Tucker (2014).
Carbon Source Properties
| Source | %C | COD/g | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sucrose (sugar) | 42% | 1.07 | Fast |
| Molasses | 30% | 0.95 | Fast |
| Jaggery | 40% | 1.00 | Fast |
| Tapioca starch | 44% | 1.18 | Moderate |
| Corn starch | 44% | 1.18 | Moderate |
| Wheat flour | 40% | 1.15 | Moderate |
| Rice bran | 38% | 1.30 | Slow |
| Glycerol | 39% | 1.22 | Fast |
| Sodium acetate | 29% | 0.78 | Very fast |
Primary References
- Avnimelech, Y. (1999). Carbon/nitrogen ratio as a control element in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture, 176, 227-235.
- Avnimelech, Y. (2009). Biofloc Technology — A Practical Guide Book. World Aquaculture Society.
- Ebeling, J.M., Timmons, M.B., Bisogni, J.J. (2006). Engineering analysis of the stoichiometry of photoautotrophic, autotrophic, and heterotrophic removal of ammonia-nitrogen. Aquaculture, 257, 346-358.
- De Schryver, P., Crab, R., Defoirdt, T., Boon, N., Verstraete, W. (2008). The basics of bio-flocs technology. Aquaculture, 277, 125-137.
- Crab, R., Defoirdt, T., Bossier, P., Verstraete, W. (2012). Biofloc technology in aquaculture. Aquaculture, 356-357, 351-356.
- Emerson, K., Russo, R.C., Lund, R.E., Thurston, R.V. (1975). Aqueous ammonia equilibrium calculations. J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 32, 2379-2383.
- Lin, Y.-C., Chen, J.-C. (2001, 2003). Acute toxicity of ammonia/nitrite on Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture, 224, 193-201.
- Boyd, C.E., Hargreaves, J.A. (2001). SRAC Publication 4503: Alkalinity in fish ponds.
- Hargreaves, J.A. (2013). Biofloc production systems for aquaculture. SRAC Publication 4503.